From owner-freebsd-current Wed Sep 4 18:26:10 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA12628 for current-outgoing; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 18:26:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA12623 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 18:26:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with SMTP id SAA18089 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 18:26:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id SAA07805; Wed, 4 Sep 1996 18:22:24 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199609050122.SAA07805@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Latest Current build failure To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 18:22:23 -0700 (MST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, rkw@dataplex.net, current@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <5176.841886288@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Sep 4, 96 06:18:08 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Be prepared to revisit this discussion every 3-4 months, as we have > > for several years now, then, for the same reasons: tabling an issue > > does not resolve it. > > Nor does discussing it, apparently, as both avoidance and discussion > are currently tied 1-1 on their general ineffectiveness scores. > > We can either try for a new strategy or we can continue to fail with > the current ones for another 3 years, that's what it looks like to > me. What do you suggest for a third option? It seems to me that resolving to allow someone to implement something with the results of the discussion would change that to 1-0 on their relative ineffectiveness scores. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.