From owner-freebsd-current Tue Dec 24 14:30:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 931) id BD8C237B401; Tue, 24 Dec 2002 14:30:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 14:30:10 -0800 From: Juli Mallett To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey Cc: TwinsPop , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: calcru: negative time? Message-ID: <20021224143010.A40216@FreeBSD.org> References: <20021224213702.GD661@jon.rusts.net> <20021224222711.GE79700@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20021224222711.GE79700@wantadilla.lemis.com>; from grog@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 08:57:11AM +1030 Organisation: The FreeBSD Project X-Alternate-Addresses: , , , , X-Towel: Yes X-LiveJournal: flata, jmallett X-Negacore: Yes Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * De: Greg 'groggy' Lehey [ Data: 2002-12-24 ] [ Subjecte: Re: calcru: negative time? ] > The canonical answer is "you need to build a kernel without the apm > device". But it's not in GENERIC any more. It's also surprising that > you haven't seen this problem before: there's nothing specific to 5.0 > about it. If you spend too much busy time in the kernel (say a tight loop), it can happen, I think. I saw it a lot when I had a continue instead of a break in a fairly tight loop, I think. -- Juli Mallett OpenDarwin, Mono, FreeBSD Developer. ircd-hybrid Developer, EFnet addict. FreeBSD on MIPS-Anything on FreeBSD. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message