From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 16 17:48:12 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C2B16A4CE
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:48:12 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from marlena.vvi.at (marlena.vvi.at [208.252.225.59])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB9043D49
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:48:11 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from www@marlena.vvi.at)
Received: from marlena.vvi.at (localhost.marlena.vvi.at [127.0.0.1])
	by marlena.vvi.at (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j1FLqZoH034975;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:52:40 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from www@marlena.vvi.at)
Received: (from www@localhost)
	by marlena.vvi.at (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id j1FLqU3f034974;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:52:30 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from www)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:52:30 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200502152152.j1FLqU3f034974@marlena.vvi.at>
To: jeremie@le-hen.org
From: "ALeine" <aleine@austrosearch.net>
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: RFC: backporting GEOM to the 4.x branch 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:48:12 -0000

jeremie@le-hen.org wrote: 

> What about porting NetBSD's cgd(4) [1] driver ?  It *might* be
> easier to port since it does not require GEOM.

Thanks for the suggestion, but IMHO GBDE is superior to CGD, as I have
already explained in detail a couple of weeks ago:

http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/kernel/2005-02/msg00037.html

ALeine

___________________________________________________________________
WebMail FREE http://mail.austrosearch.net