From owner-freebsd-current Sun Oct 1 10:53:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E9B37B502 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 10:53:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA00621; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 11:53:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id LAA00931; Sun, 1 Oct 2000 11:53:21 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010011753.LAA00931@harmony.village.org> To: Alan Cox Subject: Re: kthread_create() Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 30 Sep 2000 18:35:51 CDT." <20000930183551.A2132@cs.rice.edu> References: <20000930183551.A2132@cs.rice.edu> Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2000 11:53:21 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20000930183551.A2132@cs.rice.edu> Alan Cox writes: : Does anyone know if it's by design or by accident that kthread_create : specifies RFFDG to fork1? It seems odd to ask for the file descriptor : table to be copied and not shared. I think that I did that, or Peter didn't change it. I copied it from NetBSD of the time. I think it made sense to me since I wanted stdout to be the console. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message