From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Apr 25 12:30:15 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from area51.fremont.ca.us (d60-076.leach.ucdavis.edu [169.237.60.76])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 279741555B; Sun, 25 Apr 1999 12:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mharo@area51.fremont.ca.us)
Received: (from mharo@localhost)
	by area51.fremont.ca.us (8.9.2/8.9.2) id MAA32377;
	Sun, 25 Apr 1999 12:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mharo)
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1999 12:30:12 -0700
From: Michael Haro <mharo@area51.fremont.ca.us>
To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, asami@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Ok to remove gtk11-devel?
Message-ID: <19990425123012.A32328@area51.fremont.ca.us>
References: <19990425112336.A29492@area51.fremont.ca.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i
In-Reply-To: <19990425112336.A29492@area51.fremont.ca.us>; from Michael Haro on Sun, Apr 25, 1999 at 11:23:36AM -0700
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

I spoke too soon.  I did the grep test in my test ports tree where
I had changed all the references to gtk11d to gtk12.

As a result there are still a few ports which use gtk11-devel.  That
number is shrinking though, but not small enough.

Michael

On Sun, Apr 25, 1999 at 11:23:36AM -0700, Michael Haro wrote:
> As of right now there is only 1 port who's makefile contains
> gtk11d, that port is the gtk11-devel port.
> 
> Unless you know of a reason it should stay, I'll remove it later
> this week.
> 
> Michael
> 
> P.S.  1 down 2 to go. =)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message