From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 8 17:30:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FE716A4CE for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 17:30:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.10.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1AA43D2F for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 17:30:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received-SPF: pass (eva.fit.vutbr.cz: domain of xdivac02@eva.fit.vutbr.cz designates 127.0.0.1 as permitted sender) receiver=eva.fit.vutbr.cz; client_ip=127.0.0.1; envelope-from=xdivac02@eva.fit.vutbr.cz; Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iA8HU709093522 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 18:30:07 +0100 (CET) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.12.11/8.12.5/Submit) id iA8HU7nA093521 for current@freebsd.org; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 18:30:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 18:30:07 +0100 From: Divacky Roman To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041108173007.GA93246@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <2602.1099910947@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2602.1099910947@critter.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Please help test device vnode bypass! X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 17:30:12 -0000 > > On a 700MHz K7 machine this doubles the speed of > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=1 count=1000000 > > > > This roughly translates to shaving 2usec of each read/write syscall. I tried it (no problem yet) and did a bit testing... (cp -R /sys/ /tmp/s, dd if=/dev/zero of=smth count=1000000, cp smth smth1 and so on) and it seems like its actually a bit slower (but everything works properly) - did I get anything wrong? should the results be a bit better (I did three runs every time of each test) roman