From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 15 09:31:36 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD5C16A4DF
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:31:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.ciam.ru (mail.ciam.ru [213.147.57.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76BD43D2D
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:31:35 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from ppp83-237-98-36.pppoe.mtu-net.ru ([83.237.98.36])
	by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x)
	id 1CeVVN-0007FF-QR; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:31:34 +0300
Message-ID: <41C00477.9090003@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:31:35 +0300
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Chvostek <paul+fbsd@it.ca>
References: <41BE4CAA.9000208@FreeBSD.org> <20041214211528.GC74668@it.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20041214211528.GC74668@it.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/75018: [maintainer update]: net-mgmt/rotorouter wasmissing
 a file from its plist...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:31:36 -0000

Paul Chvostek wrote:

> By simply including the conf file in the +CONTENTS, without this
> @unexec, a `pkg_delete` will remove the package but leave an altered
> conf file, while `make deinstall` will remove the conf file as well.

It just because of deinstall target run 'pkg_delete -f'.
The reason an author did it is understandable, but I don't know is this 
the right way.

-- 
Sem.