From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov 14 10:28:10 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB251A83
 for <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:28:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com (mail-la0-x22f.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8503AFFD
 for <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:28:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id gd6so14480785lab.6
 for <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 02:28:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=specialbusservice.com; s=google;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=h2DQGWrHYEuqfBPWQ44PYcUnbq6HUXO2HBhaf/CFP7M=;
 b=o21WZTBvi6mn1O5Xn6A4O6aeLolml4yYLnKXW2AeMgbmeMS7Kuh/MMoNqlB8mMOzEm
 vCilYIAwiatarvx9wVoAkpDLTD0eGIb5VKyqsrnjVw7q8adCSRbn2cfXq6bOwvi/Z0CV
 YjR3dUSA6dHyI7bHFMyb+N6KtQ9sT7u4Ok/oM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=h2DQGWrHYEuqfBPWQ44PYcUnbq6HUXO2HBhaf/CFP7M=;
 b=At48ihgRv/8fL1etk9bPPp2fN58o1JX1u0T7KGjBkPfbP7jroo9s72XZSjgnGCgYiJ
 s0cHWK4J0bh4jbuoTg3f4YinUtHYag9Zhd1WHnGiZz+K4ZeKA41lHpciTt+lZD0IyYyi
 aQQ7L8i1H0R5rMLJZtm5zfFv/fvOT5FSKnxYd7kcCNcegpS9HbpyGbtzwt+Tku/rVSk+
 p3m2zN3kRhK9r+PNfbWfbqPoR+uzrW8EduHXompcWLtp/zPwSTE53brOSkaPBSxBBD99
 CXfCQgBLSkRvTwNXgjQ42A41H0i9B6v3NeXlzYKswH9ydTG3LZ8mIaHCKEUCabamuvAf
 dc8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn4KU0M0wTwatmnz4OisqBa6APGumGTLqPiFC9rwa4FLrz4eEZUUBk90YR97C8sta7aRuJ1
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.199.227 with SMTP id jn3mr1068345lbc.86.1415960888433;
 Fri, 14 Nov 2014 02:28:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.152.0.197 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 02:28:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <bug-194828-32464-gV6nGjZR8b@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-194828-32464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
 <bug-194828-32464-gV6nGjZR8b@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:28:08 +0000
Message-ID: <CAK4o1WwnhBAcHqoLuL78DW=3ffn-WEo8=fSX5CAPZcATzpUOxg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug 194828] [test] lib.libc.sys.getcontext_test.setcontext_link
 fails on amd64, not i386
From: Justin Cormack <justin@specialbusservice.com>
To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD <freebsd-testing.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-testing>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-testing-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-testing/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-testing-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-testing>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-testing-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:28:10 -0000

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:35 AM,  <bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org> wrote:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194828
>
> --- Comment #12 from Garrett Cooper,425-314-3911 <ngie@FreeBSD.org> ---
> In a perfect world I would like for everything to be consistent between FreeBSD
> and NetBSD, but that's not the way it should be, and that's a silly ideal to
> hope for :).

NetBSD dev here... I would rather that tests actually test behaviour
as defined in standards, especially for eg libc tests, and indeed I
have bunch of stuff to add more tests on standards compliance.  So if
stuff is testing implementation internals it should go away, and if
NetBSDs behaviour is incorrect please file an issue, or if the test
setup is not eg standards compliant please file an issue
http://www.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/sendpr.cgi?gndb=netbsd

Justin