From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 9 10:41:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CAB16A46B for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:41:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etc@fluffles.net) Received: from auriate.fluffles.net (cust.95.160.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.95.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2169013C45B for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:41:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etc@fluffles.net) Received: from 195-241-125-45.dsl.ip.tiscali.nl ([195.241.125.45] helo=[10.0.0.18]) by auriate.fluffles.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1I7q2v-000O6B-MW; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:00:45 +0200 Message-ID: <46920754.6080901@fluffles.net> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:00:52 +0200 From: Fluffles User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ulf Lilleengen References: <20070709092252.GA7809@stud.ntnu.no> In-Reply-To: <20070709092252.GA7809@stud.ntnu.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 11:21:36 +0000 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Patches for updated gvinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:41:20 -0000 Ulf Lilleengen wrote: > Hi, > > Gvinum just got better. At least, that's what I hope. Lukas rewrote gvinum to > use a simpler and easier to handle single-thread event system, and I have been > adapting existing code to this. The result can be found in the patches here: > Nice to see gvinum get's the facelift it so desperately needed. It's unfortunate gvinum was never able to recover from the GEOM-age, until now maybe. :-) However, do you think that it's performance is affected too? Last time i tested, i was not impressed with gvinum's RAID5 performance, write speeds were very low. RAID0 and RAID1 appeared to be on par with gstripe and gmirror though. I guess gvinum is primary for people who feel comfortable with its configuration and user-interface. > Therefore, I hope many will > test this patch and help discovering bugs that otherwise would just stay there. > I will be able to test this on my new test system, coming Wedsnesday. This consists of a modern dualcore AMD 3GHz processor with 4GB RAM and 8 SATA disks. If you like, i can report my findings to the list when i'm done. Regards, Veronica