Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 19:34:54 +0200 From: Eric Masson <emss@free.fr> To: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> Cc: Mailing List FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Option in port depending on another port, how to handle ? Message-ID: <867hil383l.fsf@srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org> In-Reply-To: <86hbhvgjiy.fsf@gmail.com> (Anonymous's message of "Sun, 12 Sep 2010 17:48:21 %2B0400") References: <868w376t0f.fsf@srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org> <86r5gzi1cx.fsf@gmail.com> <86zkvn5brs.fsf@srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org> <86hbhvgjiy.fsf@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> writes:
Hello,
> Why not extract it as a dependency then?
>
> .if defined(WITH_HTTP_UWSGI_MODULE)
> CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --add-module=${UWSGI_WRKSRC}/nginx
> BUILD_DEPENDS+= ${NONEXISTENT}:${PORTSDIR}/www/uwsgi:patch
> UWSGI_WRKSRC!= ${MAKE} -V WRKSRC -C ${PORTSDIR}/www/uwsgi
> .endif
Well, I've upgraded to nginx-devel as the uwsgi plugin is in the base
distribution.
Don't know if having uwsgi plugin in www/nginx is desirable to a wider
audience.
I don't know if using an older revision of the uwsgi tarball would be a
major issue. If not, I could submit my first patch.
Regards
Thanks for your help
Eric Masson
--
M> cliquez sur les deux première bannières dans ce site.
M> http://www.xXxXbzz.fr/diabetique
scientologie piege a cons
-+- JS in GNU - La secte des mangeurs de sucre a frappé -+-
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?867hil383l.fsf>