From owner-freebsd-security Wed Dec 4 17:17:34 1996 Return-Path: owner-security Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.3/8.7.3) id RAA27899 for security-outgoing; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 17:17:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from sunrise.gv.ssi1.com (sunrise.gv.ssi1.com [146.252.44.191]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA27877 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 17:17:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from salsa.gv.ssi1.com (salsa.gv.ssi1.com [146.252.44.194]) by sunrise.gv.ssi1.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id RAA14957; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 17:17:22 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gdonl@localhost) by salsa.gv.ssi1.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id RAA02670; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 17:17:18 -0800 (PST) From: Don Lewis Message-Id: <199612050117.RAA02670@salsa.gv.ssi1.com> Date: Wed, 4 Dec 1996 17:17:18 -0800 In-Reply-To: Nate Williams "Re: Sendmail 8.8.4 questions..." (Dec 4, 6:06pm) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 alpha(3) 7/19/95) To: Nate Williams , Don Lewis Subject: Re: Sendmail 8.8.4 questions... Cc: Richard Wackerbarth , freebsd-security@freebsd.org Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Dec 4, 6:06pm, Nate Williams wrote: } Subject: Re: Sendmail 8.8.4 questions... } > } > I just got a ctm update for -stable in the mail today. It looks like the } > first one since 2.1.6.1, which is only about a week and a half old. } } I forgot that Satoshi made a change to bsd.port.mk last night. Whee... Can't say I thought this one was critical ... } > I'll agree that it's dead as far as new development, but I'll have it } > running here for quite a while yet. I'd like to see security patches } > released as needed. } } How would they be distributed? ctm updates work fine for me. --- Truck