Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 23:04:33 +0100 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't link kernel after recent libalias commits? Message-ID: <200612302304.39194.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <20061230214609.GA6996@tin.it> References: <20061230195219.GD64111@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <20061230214321.GG64111@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <20061230214609.GA6996@tin.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1627022.QJtX7MaApS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 30 December 2006 22:46, Paolo Pisati wrote: > On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 01:43:21PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > > Note that this was for a kernel that uses ipfw, but not natd (ref. > > src/sys/conf/NOTES). > > my mistake, i'll write an entry for UPDATING. Shouldn't it still be possible to build a kernel with IPFW but without=20 LIBALIAS? i.e. instead of a UPDATING entry you should just wrap the=20 libalias entry points in IPFW - or am I misunderstanding what you are=20 saying? =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart1627022.QJtX7MaApS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFluJ3XyyEoT62BG0RAjMpAJ9nuyjxQuT2Mai87zCjrLF+HyGflQCfVups Heu/elJF1vPZhejWB5B+QLg= =QK4T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1627022.QJtX7MaApS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200612302304.39194.max>