From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 10 00:01:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2800106566B for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:01:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zim.MIT.EDU (ZIM.MIT.EDU [18.95.3.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931228FC0C for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:01:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zim.MIT.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zim.MIT.EDU (8.14.4/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p1A00xFL095080; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:00:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by zim.MIT.EDU (8.14.4/8.14.2/Submit) id p1A00xog095079; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:00:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:00:59 -0500 From: David Schultz To: d@delphij.net Message-ID: <20110210000059.GA95033@zim.MIT.EDU> Mail-Followup-To: d@delphij.net, utisoft@gmail.com, freebsd-standards@freebsd.org References: <4D53064B.7090901@delphij.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D53064B.7090901@delphij.net> Cc: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should we imitate GNU test's insanity? X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:01:06 -0000 On Wed, Feb 09, 2011, Xin LI wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 02/09/11 12:46, Chris Rees wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've found so many cases of autoconf failing when porting Linux apps > > over, for example scilab and musicpd due to the happiness of GNU test > > to accept a == b rather than a = b. > > > > Rather than making a bug report that'll be brushed off (as my bug > > report for GNU find was), would it be unthinkable for me to make a > > patch for our test to make == acceptable, to stop some wasted porters' > > time? > > I don't think == is unacceptable extension to the POSIX standard based > on my reading. If there is no objection I'll commit the attached patch > on Friday. I agree; unobtrusive extensions that improve compatibility are welcome.