From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 3 13: 0:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net (pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C641437B419; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:00:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from pool0238.cvx40-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([216.244.42.238] helo=mindspring.com) by pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16MEyI-00064T-00; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:00:19 -0800 Message-ID: <3C34C664.653465B0@mindspring.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:00:20 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Rabson Cc: Matthew Dillon , John Baldwin , Peter Jeremy , Michal Mertl , Bruce Evans , Mike Smith , Bernd Walter , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: When to use atomic_ functions? (was: 64 bit counters) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Doug Rabson wrote: > Whatever you do for SMP and per-cpu stuff, you will never be able to > safely write '++*p' on non-x86 architectures. Which hopefully puts a big honking nail in that coffin... -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message