Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 24 May 2024 18:29:31 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        gnome@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 279275] x11/babl: sort out Makfile and pet portclippy
Message-ID:  <bug-279275-6497-Dwy0wXitwR@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-279275-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-279275-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bugzilla Automation <bugzilla@FreeBSD.org> has asked freebsd-gnome (Nobody)
<gnome@FreeBSD.org> for maintainer-feedback:
Bug 279275: x11/babl: sort out Makfile and pet portclippy
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D279275



--- Description ---
Suggested by diizzy https://reviews.freebsd.org/D45094#1028356:=20
> x11/babl likely doesn't require libtool, you can probably drop localbase =
or
or at least use localbase:ldflags
Both removed.
> SIMD option is only relevant on i386/amd64 (fix) and we can at least alwa=
ys
rely on SSE2 on amd64 (requirement).
Limit SIMD to i386/amd64, default for i386 is MMX only, for amd64 SSE2. But
users can turn on or off all SIMD sets during build.=20
> It would be nice(r) if we could rely on CPUTYPE from the framework

Tested build in poudriere and on live system 13.3-p2 amd64 and i386 with
different combinations of SIMDs and CPUTYPE in /etc/make.conf.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-279275-6497-Dwy0wXitwR>