From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Oct  9  8:58:52 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3FABF37B401; Wed,  9 Oct 2002 08:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (rwcrmhc52.attbi.com [216.148.227.88])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 929AD43E3B; Wed,  9 Oct 2002 08:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bmah@employees.org)
Received: from bmah.dyndns.org ([12.233.149.189]) by rwcrmhc52.attbi.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
          id <20021009155844.DAGA2722.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@bmah.dyndns.org>;
          Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:58:44 +0000
Received: from intruder.bmah.org (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by bmah.dyndns.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g99Fwi8W019167;
	Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bmah@intruder.bmah.org)
Received: (from bmah@localhost)
	by intruder.bmah.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g99Fwh4E019166;
	Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200210091558.g99Fwh4E019166@intruder.bmah.org>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
Cc: "Ulrich 'Q' Spoerlein" <q@galgenberg.net>,
	Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.ORG>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG,
	re@FreeBSD.ORG, qa@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Please test LDT patch 
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0210091450260.49535-100000@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> 
References: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0210091450260.49535-100000@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
Comments: In-reply-to Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
   message dated "Wed, 09 Oct 2002 15:55:33 +0200."
From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG>
Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5<Pi&akO)o^8;[r
 %l(8ZHlbF`dD>v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A
 2V%N&+
X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif
X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-2102402129P";
	 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:58:43 -0700
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-stable.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-stable>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-stable>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

--==_Exmh_-2102402129P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

If memory serves me right, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

> I can try to check the patch above; is it supposed to fix a bug, that
> is, should the situation improve using it?

The patch is supposed to fix a bug, but I don't think it was for the 
situation you described.

We were mostly interested to know if the patch caused any regressions.  
Knowing this is still useful, but the patch has already been committed 
to 4-STABLE and 4.7-RELEASE.

Thanks!

Bruce.



--==_Exmh_-2102402129P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5+ 20020506

iD8DBQE9pFIz2MoxcVugUsMRAiL+AKCbzqPVCiY8kpDx3THEbcj9EWvgzQCfQ6Jz
osV5eKufehsGgXNiWotnleA=
=zWEJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_-2102402129P--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message