From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 27 23:05:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A40AB5 for ; Mon, 27 May 2013 23:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com (mail-wi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3013226 for ; Mon, 27 May 2013 23:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hn14so2647677wib.2 for ; Mon, 27 May 2013 16:05:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nm4SvZ9as+w46yctnu691A6yv7dX10XcQCFhgyyqzcA=; b=EIzJkDk8Qx0H3XOTVUujD9hUmOu+YpJ+y3WOE0YRrWqFI8y4vTGvRv2fbIy4bFPKjK hdbroF5FzPaMSlF+2HPeGaInm6l+btnUF5PDn64/UgCjPpdiGvgzJQ8gZ2hhigY6y7S2 zP52NRSJwDQ9HdEfxXogsjxSW/Li2yd+01ZlS67GOmCxfH6+oNIHaoHlzDt8eFFq9jvX EUZ6HMAijopj5fhuQHGWB8Q0nSY4cbCNY779chP/9OhP5rxRm1fPrFlJj2BN8TEu6Sz+ a00MSJmVxNK9Wvp2oxOOJbeeqzTXhZW6oO7/jR3ARU7Gnverav4oZu1bPJSz0E1UVaeE JB7Q== X-Received: by 10.194.83.5 with SMTP id m5mr8341038wjy.20.1369695907973; Mon, 27 May 2013 16:05:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q13sm20588108wie.8.2013.05.27.16.05.06 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 27 May 2013 16:05:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 00:05:05 +0100 From: RW To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The vim port needs a refresh Message-ID: <20130528000505.6c506b1a@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <51A3C331.901@marino.st> References: <20130524212318.B967FE6739@smtp.hushmail.com> <20130527140609.3d3b9d23@gumby.homeunix.com> <444ndofstn.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20130527153440.020ab20e@gumby.homeunix.com> <51A3798C.9000004@marino.st> <20130527173633.0e196a08@gumby.homeunix.com> <51A38D87.8070102@marino.st> <20130527183620.5ff9d8b0@gumby.homeunix.com> <51A3A813.1060908@marino.st> <20130527210924.36432f32@gumby.homeunix.com> <51A3C331.901@marino.st> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 23:05:10 -0000 On Mon, 27 May 2013 22:33:53 +0200 John Marino wrote: > On 5/27/2013 22:09, RW wrote: > > On Mon, 27 May 2013 20:38:11 +0200 > > John Marino wrote: > > > > > > No, that's something you just made up. It is however vague and > > anecdotal. We have only one data point that we know is from this > > year and not self-inflicted, even if the others are, for all we > > know it could still be fast most of the time. > > > > Some monitoring would be useful. > > > > However you slice it, a distinfo file with 1000+ entries is > completely absurd. 95% of the blame goes to Vim developers. > However, it is within the realm of feasibility to pre-package patches > in batches of 100 (or conversely 1 tarball of patches rolled for > every time patch count hits multiple of 100). In other words downloading every patch twice. > At the very, very least maybe only HTTP hosts are listed for VIM (I > just checked bsd.sites.mk, the ftp sites are all at the end of the > list now) All 13 http links would have to fail before the ftp links are tried. > It looks like some of this was addressed in January though: I already told you that. > > I may have still been on the old bsd.sites.mk with a site > 10 > seconds per file. (this is yet another data point) We already knew that it was slow before January, so that's irrelevant.