From owner-freebsd-current Fri Dec 26 13:24:52 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA05586 for current-outgoing; Fri, 26 Dec 1997 13:24:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA05539 for ; Fri, 26 Dec 1997 13:24:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA23351; Fri, 26 Dec 1997 14:24:04 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id OAA10034; Fri, 26 Dec 1997 14:24:01 -0700 Date: Fri, 26 Dec 1997 14:24:01 -0700 Message-Id: <199712262124.OAA10034@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Amancio Hasty Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel threads api? In-Reply-To: <199712261951.LAA01796@rah.star-gate.com> References: <199712261951.LAA01796@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Wondering if there is enough kernel threads api to support something like > java 1.1.5. Not really, plus the 'thread' support in Java isn't as good as the built-in green-thread support. Many programs behave 'OK' with green-threads and don't with most unix kernel threads (including Solaris). Nate