From owner-freebsd-emulation  Thu Jan 16 14:16:22 1997
Return-Path: <owner-emulation>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id OAA17372
          for emulation-outgoing; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 14:16:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from perki0.connect.com.au (perki0.connect.com.au [192.189.54.85])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id OAA17339
          for <emulation@freebsd.org>; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 14:16:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from Unemeton@localhost) by perki0.connect.com.au id JAA11037
  (8.7.6h/IDA-1.6); Fri, 17 Jan 1997 09:15:45 +1100 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: perki0.connect.com.au: Unemeton set sender to giles@nemeton.com.au using -f
>Received: from localhost.nemeton.com.au (localhost.nemeton.com.au [127.0.0.1])
          by nemeton.com.au (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id JAA26525; Fri, 17 Jan 1997 09:06:24 +1100 (EST)
Message-Id: <199701162206.JAA26525@nemeton.com.au>
To: Jean-Henri Duteau <jeand@myrias.com>
cc: emulation@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Emulation of HP-UX or A*X? 
In-reply-to: <xktvi8xo1ta.fsf@sparcbhl.Myrias.AB.CA> 
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 1997 09:06:23 +1100
From: Giles Lean <giles@nemeton.com.au>
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 16 Jan 1997 12:30:25 -0700  Jean-Henri Duteau wrote:

> For instance, how would you remotely run a command on another machine.
> If you answered RSH, you lose.  It's REMSH on HPUX.  Yuck!!!

Nah, they just chose to prefer SysV appearance to BSD when there was a
conflict, and both had commands named 'rsh'.

SCO mad a similar choice; other vendors said "SysV loses".

I guess you fall into the "the hell with SysV" camp. :-)

Giles