From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 21 08:14:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50D016A4CE; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 08:14:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web.portaone.com (mail.russia.cz [195.70.151.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2B043D2F; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 08:14:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sobomax@portaone.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (xDSL-2-2.united.net.ua [193.111.9.226]) (authenticated bits=0) by web.portaone.com (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i7L8E81S045712 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 21 Aug 2004 10:14:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sobomax@portaone.com) Message-ID: <41270448.7080501@portaone.com> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 11:14:00 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Vanilla I. Shu" References: <200408201956.i7KJupiA036894@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040821010059.GA52839@fatpipi.cirx.org> In-Reply-To: <20040821010059.GA52839@fatpipi.cirx.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/centericq Makefileports/net/centericq/files extra-patch-gcc34 X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 08:14:51 -0000 Vanilla I. Shu wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 07:56:50PM +0000, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >>sobomax 2004-08-20 19:56:50 UTC >> FreeBSD ports repository >> Modified files: >> net/centericq Makefile >> Added files: >> net/centericq/files extra-patch-gcc34 >> Log: >> Unbreak with gcc 3.4. >> Obtained from: Gentoo >> Based on: http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/net-im/centericq/files/centericq-4.9.12-gcc3.4.patch > > I know you unbreak this ports, > > but how about give a chance to our new committer(clsung)? > > and respect other committer? Well, considering the following factors: a) in no case this patch can make situation worser than it is already; b) port have been broken for the quite some time now, and the problem was already reported on mailing lists several times, so that maintainer certainly had his chance to act; c) I've sent patch to the author of the software, so that hopefully he will integrate it into the next official release. I decided that contacting maintainer doesn't worth it, I apologise if it caused any bad feelings to clsung. In general I think that there are cases (like this for example) when contacting maintainer is not quite necessary. -Maxim