From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 01:00:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0FAF6E7 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 01:00:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1DF2467 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 01:00:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.yuri.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7510uRs030944 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 18:00:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Message-ID: <53E02CC8.10900@rawbw.com> Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 18:00:56 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Why USE_PYTHON=yes doesn't rebuild default python meta-port? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 01:00:57 -0000 I am rebuilding the port hierarchy with the top port having USE_PYTHON=yes. This package runs python-config. But only python2 and python27 were actually built, and therefore only python2-config is available and my port breaks. Default meta-port python-2.7, that would have contained python-config, wasn't built. But USE_PYTHON=yes asks for the default python, doesn't it? So is this a bug in the make scripts, or else why default python version wasn't built? FreeBSD-10 with current ports tree. Yuri