From owner-freebsd-chat  Tue Aug  5 23:19:33 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA02143
          for chat-outgoing; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 23:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA02137
          for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 23:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1])
	by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.6/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA01480;
	Tue, 5 Aug 1997 23:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199708060619.XAA01480@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
To: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@kithrup.com>
cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: uunet vs. internet 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 05 Aug 1997 22:35:01 PDT."
             <199708060535.WAA24247@kithrup.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 1997 23:19:24 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hang on a second, UUNet is the Internet 8)

At least thats what their actions are implying --- "to hell with
netiguettes we are Uunet" !!

	Cheers,
	Amancio

		
>From The Desk Of Sean Eric Fagan :
> In article <3.0.2.32.19970805232135.006b75c0.kithrup.freebsd.chat@bythehand.n
et> Bernard Courtney wrote:
> >I would have to agree, I would support UUNET in any action that they take.
> 
> Really?
> 
> UUNET is threatening lawsuits and criminal charges against the folks doing
> the UDP.
> 
> I've got a letter from someone which is trying to imply that the office of
> the president is pissed and will take direct action -- which would mean the
> secret service.
> 
> So you support that?
>