From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 26 13:09:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 806A51065684 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:09:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5664F8FC14 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:09:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.61.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E499C170E3; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:09:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m7QD9uKS095750; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:09:56 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: pluknet From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:05:48 +0400." Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:09:56 +0000 Message-ID: <95749.1219756196@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sector size of 4096 bytes (not 512) X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:09:58 -0000 In message , plukne t writes: >2008/8/26 Poul-Henning Kamp : >> This answer has nothing to do with the question asked, and is wrong in >> just about every way it can be. >> >I'm talking about on-disk sector-size, not about filesystem's block-size. I wrote the code that implementes both of those :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.