Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 22:14:21 -0500 From: Jud <judmarc@fastmail.fm> To: "Craig Caughlin" <craigcaughlin@comcast.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Boot manager clarification Message-ID: <opry4gl71m0cf2rk@mail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <000001c3b1fa$e3dd3010$0101a8c0@p4> References: <000001c3b1fa$e3dd3010$0101a8c0@p4>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 11:49:21 -0800, Craig Caughlin <craigcaughlin@comcast.net> wrote: > Hi folks, > I have 2 hard disks, each on their own channel. I have XOSL installed as > my > boot manager, in Drive 1, Partition 1. I have Windows 2000-Pro on Drive > 1, > Partition 2. I want to install FreeBSD 5.0 on Drive 2, but use XOSL to > load > it. > > Should I install FreeBSD using the "Standard" MBR option, or should I use > the "BootMgr" option? I *think* I would want to use the standard, > because it > seems like the BootMgr option would install in the MBR of Disk 1 and NOT > Disk 2, thereby goofing up XOSL (which is what I'm trying to avoid!). You think correctly. :) Jud
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?opry4gl71m0cf2rk>