Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 05:51:25 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Dvo=F8=E1k?= <dandee@hellteam.net> To: "'Sam Leffler'" <sam@errno.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: atheros driver under high load, panics and even more freezes Message-ID: <000001c6d167$ba63fef0$6508280a@tocnet28.jspoj.czf> In-Reply-To: <44FB0593.3090108@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
And there is diffrence even between -i 0.002 and 0.0019 0.002 is okay 1,4ms 0,0019 means "no buffers, PL, big latency, OACTIVE flag" with -f no problem 0% PL and avg latency 1,5 ms and the throughput 0,89MB/s IN and OUT. Daniel I am sorry for dividing to 3 emails. > -----Original Message----- > From: Sam Leffler [mailto:sam@errno.com] > Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 6:41 PM > To: dandee@volny.cz > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: atheros driver under high load, panics and even > more freezes > > Daniel Dvořák wrote: > > Ok, I will upgrade my boxes and I will do simple ping tests again. > > > > Did you see my sysctl.conf file ? > > > > I mean these options: > > > > kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=2097152 > > net.inet.ip.fastforwarding=1 > > net.inet.tcp.sendspace=65536 > > > > Could be this connected with increasing latency up to 500ms ? > > Seems unlikely but I have little to go on. You can easily > identify whether the delays are in the OS or due to wireless > issues by sniffing traffic. Tools like athstats are also > important for diagnosing problems. > > Sam >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000001c6d167$ba63fef0$6508280a>