Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 6 Sep 2006 05:51:25 +0200
From:      =?iso-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Dvo=F8=E1k?= <dandee@hellteam.net>
To:        "'Sam Leffler'" <sam@errno.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   RE: atheros driver under high load, panics and even more freezes
Message-ID:  <000001c6d167$ba63fef0$6508280a@tocnet28.jspoj.czf>
In-Reply-To: <44FB0593.3090108@errno.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
And there is diffrence even between=20

-i 0.002 and 0.0019
0.002 is okay 1,4ms 0,0019 means "no buffers, PL, big latency, OACTIVE =
flag"

with -f no problem 0% PL and avg latency 1,5 ms and the throughput =
0,89MB/s
IN and OUT.

Daniel

I am sorry for dividing to 3 emails.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam Leffler [mailto:sam@errno.com]=20
> Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 6:41 PM
> To: dandee@volny.cz
> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: atheros driver under high load, panics and even=20
> more freezes
>=20
> Daniel Dvo=F8=E1k wrote:
> > Ok, I will upgrade my boxes and I will do simple ping tests again.
> >=20
> > Did you see my sysctl.conf file ?
> >=20
> > I mean these options:
> >=20
> > kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=3D2097152
> > net.inet.ip.fastforwarding=3D1
> > net.inet.tcp.sendspace=3D65536
> >=20
> > Could be this connected with increasing latency up to 500ms ?
>=20
> Seems unlikely but I have little to go on.  You can easily=20
> identify whether the delays are in the OS or due to wireless=20
> issues by sniffing traffic.  Tools like athstats are also=20
> important for diagnosing problems.
>=20
> 	Sam
>=20




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000001c6d167$ba63fef0$6508280a>