Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:40:05 +0200 From: "Claus Guttesen" <kometen@gmail.com> To: "Danny Braniss" <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@freebsd.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bad NFS/UDP performance Message-ID: <b41c75520809290140i435a5f6dge5219cd03cad55fe@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <E1KjY2h-0008GC-PP@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> References: <E1Kj7NA-000FXz-3F@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> <20080926081806.GA19055@icarus.home.lan> <E1Kj9bR-000H7t-0g@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> <20080926095230.GA20789@icarus.home.lan> <E1KjEZw-000KkH-GP@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> <alpine.BSF.1.10.0809271114450.20117@fledge.watson.org> <E1KjY2h-0008GC-PP@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> it more difficult than I expected. > for one, the kernel date was missleading, the actual source update is the key, so > the window of changes is now 28/July to 19/August. I have the diffs, but nothing > yet seems relevant. > > on the other hand, I tried NFS/TCP, and there things seem ok, ie the 'good' and the 'bad' > give the same throughput, which seem to point to UDP changes ... Can you post the network-numbers? -- regards Claus When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentler gamester is the soonest winner. Shakespeare
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b41c75520809290140i435a5f6dge5219cd03cad55fe>