From owner-freebsd-gnome Wed Oct 2 9:54:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368E437B401; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:54:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from baraca.united.net.ua (ns.united.net.ua [193.111.8.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE6943E4A; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:54:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from vega.vega.com (xDSL-2-2.united.net.ua [193.111.9.226]) by baraca.united.net.ua (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g92GsJL24093; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 19:54:25 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vega.vega.com (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g92GsFTs050925; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 19:54:15 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <3D9B2535.72563F59@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 19:56:21 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,uk,ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Franz Klammer Cc: Marc Recht , Joe Marcus Clarke , aztlanet@gmx.net, gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: GNOME 2.1 upgrade References: <1033527725.295.11.camel@unxstar> <20021002104009.5a55baec.recht@contentmedia.de> <1033548212.1085.1.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <20021002104727.590f03a0.recht@contentmedia.de> <1033558909.38552.2.camel@ncc-1701.webonaut.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Franz Klammer wrote: > > Am Mi, 2002-10-02 um 10.47 schrieb Marc Recht: > > > This isn't going to happen anytime soon. We're shipping 4.7-RELEASE > > > with 1.4.1 as the default GNOME desktop. The primary reasons being lack > > Oh. Ok, then dropping 1.4.1 isn't that good idea.. :-) > > > > > of fully working I18N and most GNOME 2 apps are still beta at best. > > Indeed. > > > > > I think doing -devel versions is the way to go if 2.1 is put into the > > > tree. The downside of this is that there will be one more version of > > > GNOME to support. > > But, as you mentioned yourself, GNOME2 is beta. So, why not replacing the components with "official" beta versions? > > > from this point of view i go along with marc. > > maybee you send some people the ports who want test 2.1 > and if they don't have problems commit them. > > i glad to test the ports because there are still my xinerma-problems. > currently i've turend off my second monitor. I agree with Franz and Marc - we don't really need to have yet another GNOME version in the tree. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message