Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 20:36:44 +0200 From: Stefan Esser <se@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: hasty@rah.star-gate.com, luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG, rhh@ct.picker.com, Stefan Esser <se@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: snd driver attach routine Message-ID: <19970718203644.04289@mi.uni-koeln.de> In-Reply-To: <199707141046.UAA02952@godzilla.zeta.org.au>; from Bruce Evans on Mon, Jul 14, 1997 at 08:46:14PM %2B1000 References: <199707141046.UAA02952@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 14, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> wrote: > >Problem: what should be the return type of *attach() routines ? > > Perhaps it should be void to match reality, but it currently must be > int for isa drivers to match the prototype in `struct isa_driver'. > > >The drivers in /sys/pci all return void for the attach routine. > > They have to, to match the prototype in `strcuct pci_driver'. I could easily change the return type of the PCI attach function. Should I ??? Regards, STefan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970718203644.04289>