From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 16 03:35:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7081065672 for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 03:35:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C127A8FC16 for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 03:35:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 15 Aug 2008 23:06:27 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id OYJ18583; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:06:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 15 Aug 2008 23:06:27 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18598.17458.775598.315503@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:06:26 -0400 To: David Payne In-Reply-To: <1218854021.1091.9.camel@kit.dapayne.no-ip.org> References: <1218854021.1091.9.camel@kit.dapayne.no-ip.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: enemyterritory-tce: signal 11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 03:35:14 -0000 David Payne writes: > This is the email address listed in the Makefile for the > enemyterritory-tce port, I hope I am sending this to the right place. > > > MAINTAINER= ports@FreeBSD.org When the Maintainer is "ports@FreeBSD.org", it means no individual has accepted maintainership and position defaults embers of the ports mailing list in the hopes some concerned/annoyed/ interested/charitable person will step forward and fix things. (Interestingly, this sometimes produces faster and/or better responses than for ports with official custodians.) Robert Huff