From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 12:08:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C9916A41F; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 12:08:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@rea.mbslab.kiae.ru) Received: from rea.mbslab.kiae.ru (rea.mbslab.kiae.ru [144.206.177.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F35B43D46; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 12:08:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@rea.mbslab.kiae.ru) Received: from rea.mbslab.kiae.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rea.mbslab.kiae.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C4BBE7D; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:08:27 +0400 (MSD) Received: by rea.mbslab.kiae.ru (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CF50ABE7A; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:08:26 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:08:26 +0400 From: "Eygene A. Ryabinkin" To: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: <20050901120826.GB915@rea.mbslab.kiae.ru> References: <200508302009.aa99975@nowhere.iedowse.com> <43160334.5000100@samsco.org> <43160943.6030400@samsco.org> <200508312239.04897.hselasky@c2i.net> <20050901093733.GA915@rea.mbslab.kiae.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050901093733.GA915@rea.mbslab.kiae.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-AV-Checked: Yes! Cc: Scott Long , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Ian Dowse , hackers@freebsd.org, Eugene Grosbein , freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Low umass performance with USB 2.0 ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 12:08:33 -0000 > Yes, it also works and does even better work: FAT 32 and FAT 16 permormance > are just the same and there is no additional load as been with the Scott's > patch. > So I definitely would vote for this fix. Oops, it seems that this patch also does not work as expected: after some time of playing with flash card and working with the system it started to stall as unpatched system, but it freezes the system -- even IP stack was frozen (I am using DEVICE_POLLING), so I were to remove the flash from the port -- system was unfrozen and continued to work. So something is still bad with the USB. I'll try to do some long testing with USB 1.1 -- maybe it will show the same behaviour after some more time. -- rea