From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 8 08:29:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1593116A4B3 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 08:29:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org (melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org [62.212.105.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9101143FEC for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 08:29:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from thomas@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: by melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 09EF92C3D0; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 17:29:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 17:29:06 +0200 From: Thomas Quinot To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031008152906.GA7070@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> References: <200310071704.h97H4xvc076846@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200310071704.h97H4xvc076846@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-message-flag: WARNING! Using Outlook can damage your computer. Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfiles: security/calife X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 15:29:11 -0000 Le 2003-10-07, Bill "distfiles" Fenner écrivait : > whose distfiles [or main web pages] are not fetchable from their > MASTER_SITES. Could you please visit Hum, I do not understand why this is failing: calife cvs tree / pkg-descr File: calife-2.8.5.tar.gz has 1 possible URL: 0 OK, 0 bad, 1 skipped Port maintainer: thomas@FreeBSD.org ftp://postfix.eu.org/pub/calife/calife-2.8.5.tar.gz: Not checked (Last actual result NEVER [checked 0 times since Wed Dec 31 16:00:00 1969 ]) Summary 0 files fetchable out of 1 It does not make sense to me that the script won't check an URL that has never worked (the reason of that being it's a new release of the port, so obviously it has not been tested before.) -- Thomas.Quinot@Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG