Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 01:32:33 +0200 From: Olli Hauer <ohauer@FreeBSD.org> To: ports@freebsd.org Cc: Alberto Villa <avilla@freebsd.org>, Michael Scheidell <scheidell@FreeBSD.org>, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Subject: Re: MAINTAINER lines and Real Names Message-ID: <504FCA11.9000302@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAHrWK2nrLzg4ebLbgoydZ%2BfFst2jx_zvDL8BQMjv64-vk5OQFg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CADLo83925NLoD_-hAvUp7V8o6CAhqRQPcC_qrY3hEtEJc%2B%2B_fQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJp7RHZqdAh47iF5C7NQRYadLPWroHcjVDE_%2BptMOZ99eX7JYw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHrWK2nrLzg4ebLbgoydZ%2BfFst2jx_zvDL8BQMjv64-vk5OQFg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012-09-12 00:50, Michael Scheidell wrote: > Like with Apache, x 11, or perl? > Trying to get something there committed it's like pulling tiger teeth with > a pair of pliers. return I agree multiple maintainers is a bad idea. > If someone is technical enough to want to maintain that, they can always > use an alias it goes to a group. > Oh, were talking to Apache x 11 or Perl again > I see no reason for having multiple MAINTAINERS. Commit with implicit and if you like give a statement http://wiki.freebsd.org/MaintainerNotes about co-maintaining. I already wiped my eyes on this commit http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=304107 Or as Alberto already explained the reasons for a team form one. @Michael Trolling or experience? $> query-pr -c ports -r apache -y scheidel -q query-pr: no PRs matched $> query-pr -c ports -r perl -y scheidel -q oh, found two PR's for 4.11 and 5.5 $> query-pr -c ports -r x11 -y scheidel -q query-pr: no PRs matched -- Regards, olli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?504FCA11.9000302>