From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 11 23:32:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B2D106566C; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 23:32:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.233.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC358FC08; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 23:32:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: ohauer) by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16A80208D7; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 01:32:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <504FCA11.9000302@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 01:32:33 +0200 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alberto Villa , Michael Scheidell , Chris Rees Subject: Re: MAINTAINER lines and Real Names X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Ports List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 23:32:44 -0000 On 2012-09-12 00:50, Michael Scheidell wrote: > Like with Apache, x 11, or perl? > Trying to get something there committed it's like pulling tiger teeth with > a pair of pliers. return I agree multiple maintainers is a bad idea. > If someone is technical enough to want to maintain that, they can always > use an alias it goes to a group. > Oh, were talking to Apache x 11 or Perl again > I see no reason for having multiple MAINTAINERS. Commit with implicit and if you like give a statement http://wiki.freebsd.org/MaintainerNotes about co-maintaining. I already wiped my eyes on this commit http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=304107 Or as Alberto already explained the reasons for a team form one. @Michael Trolling or experience? $> query-pr -c ports -r apache -y scheidel -q query-pr: no PRs matched $> query-pr -c ports -r perl -y scheidel -q oh, found two PR's for 4.11 and 5.5 $> query-pr -c ports -r x11 -y scheidel -q query-pr: no PRs matched -- Regards, olli