Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 11 Mar 2000 04:12:41 -0700
From:      Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
To:        Darren Henderson <darren@nighttide.net>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: The Merger, and what will its effects be on committers?
Message-ID:  <4.2.2.20000311035558.0459ae80@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003102121260.24889-100000@jasper.nighttide. net>
References:  <20000311005257.D38803@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 07:36 PM 3/10/2000 , Darren Henderson wrote:

>Walnut Creek did not own FreeBSD, as much as anyone owns it the core
>does. WC was a major supporter of FreeBSD and helped it become what it
>is today.

Well, for all intents and purposes, WC realy has "owned" the right to
reproduce FreeBSD. For example, while CheapBytes sells FreeBSD discs
(and has for years), the FreeBSD Web site and the documenation in
the FreeBSD distributions mention WC *exclusively* as a source of
discs. 

Walnut Creek CD-ROM seems to have been given greatly favored status.
While it is true that WC has made large contributions to the project,
one must not ignore the conflict of interest generated by the fact 
that Jordan, David Greenman, and others deeply involved with FreeBSD 
work for WC either as employees or consultants. Since FreeBSD
has been operated as if it were a non-profit (and should be one;
hopefully it will be soon), these private inurement and conflict of
interest issues should -- no, must -- be addressed. 

Remember when, on the lists some months ago, Jordan stated 
quite bluntly that anyone who wanted to use the FreeBSD trademark
would have to reveal product plans IN ADVANCE to an employee of
Walnut Creek -- even though the product might compete with something
WC produced? 

While appreciation for WC's support is in order, the raising of
barriers to entry for newcomers is inappropriate -- especially now that 
WC and BSDi have merged. Criteria for the use of the FreeBSD trademark,
for example, should not favor Walnut Creek/BSDi. Other companies
who wish to distribute FreeBSD should NOT be required to reveal future
product plans to any employee of a competitor, nor should others' ability
to produce novel products be unduly regulated. 

--Bret Glass



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.2.20000311035558.0459ae80>