From owner-freebsd-ports Thu May 23 01:32:14 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA10359 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 23 May 1996 01:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.rwth-aachen.de (mail.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.144.9]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA10037 for ; Thu, 23 May 1996 01:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de) by mail.rwth-aachen.de (PMDF V5.0-4 #13110) id <01I51IJT6Y00001WNS@mail.rwth-aachen.de> for freebsd-ports@freefall.FreeBSD.org; Thu, 23 May 1996 10:22:39 +0100 Received: (from kuku@localhost) by gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA24850 for freebsd-ports@freefall.cdrom.com; Thu, 23 May 1996 10:29:23 +0200 Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 10:29:23 +0200 From: "Christoph P. Kukulies" Subject: fvwm95-2 stability questionable To: freebsd-ports@freefall.FreeBSD.org Message-id: <199605230829.KAA24850@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I started for fun fvwm95-2 yesterday to see if it has some advantages over olvwm (which I'm using everyday). Leaving it alone for a longer period (about an hour) I suddenly noticed, that the xperfmon window in the task bar was all red. I wonder if fvwm95-2 has some resource leak. Anyone else seen this? --Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de