From owner-freebsd-current Mon Nov 13 23:46:26 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id XAA06192 for current-outgoing; Mon, 13 Nov 1995 23:46:26 -0800 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA06187 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 1995 23:46:24 -0800 Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id XAA26872; Mon, 13 Nov 1995 23:44:51 -0800 From: Julian Elischer Message-Id: <199511140744.XAA26872@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: Disk I/O that binds To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1995 23:44:50 -0800 (PST) Cc: uhclem%nemesis@fw.ast.com, simonm@dcs.gla.ac.uk, current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199511140725.XAA00188@corbin.Root.COM> from "David Greenman" at Nov 13, 95 11:25:53 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 432 Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > Attached is the patch to disable disk block sorting. It's interesting - > I've been doing some tests here with disksort disabled and I'm actually seeing > a performance increase. I'm sure the algorithm is doing what it was written > to do...but... > My (SCSI) drive supports tagged queueing, but even with that disabled > things seem to be a bit faster. Hmmm. > > -DG yeah but you are hardly 25 users all on your own :)