From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 14 00:24:41 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB17A16A41F
for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 00:24:41 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from cisbjc@cs.unisa.edu.au)
Received: from reason.levels.unisa.edu.au (reason.levels.unisa.edu.au
[130.220.33.11])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3B543D45
for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 00:24:40 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from cisbjc@cs.unisa.edu.au)
Received: from [192.168.0.141] (cis220313.levels.unisa.edu.au [130.220.37.202])
by reason.levels.unisa.edu.au (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
j8E0OaKu032075
for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:54:38 +0930 (CST)
Message-ID: <43276D91.5000109@cs.unisa.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:53:45 +0930
From: Benjamin Close <cisbjc@cs.unisa.edu.au>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050627)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: State Of Raid 5 in RELENG_6
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 00:24:41 -0000
Hi All,
With FreeBSD 6 getting closer, I was curious about what was
happening with raid 5 support on ata-raid.
At present, raid 5 arrays are detected and can be used, though looking
at the code, there is no support for parity. Hence running raid 5 is
effectively running raid 0.
If this is likely to be the case when 6 is shipped, there should at
least be a warning regarding this at boot time.
Cheers,
Benjamin
--
3D Research Associate / System Administrator +61 8 8302 3669
School of Computer and Information Science Room D1-07, ML Campus
University of South Australia Mawson Lakes Blvd.
Benjamin.Close@cs.unisa.edu.au South Australia, 5095
F00D C83D 5F7E 5561 DF91 B74D E602 CAA3 4842 B5B4