From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jun 19 4:12:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de [137.226.30.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B5237BCA5 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 04:12:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de) Received: (from kuku@localhost) by gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA01362 for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 13:12:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kuku) Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 13:12:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Kukulies Message-Id: <200006191112.NAA01362@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: 4.0 RELEASE - why inof@clausthal? Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I installed 4.0-RELEASE as an upgrade (to a 3.4 system). Why are the files stamped Mar 22 instead Mar 20 as the release is on ftp.freebsd.org and why does the booted kernel identify as built by info@clausthal.de (or something)? I'm a bit concerned about security these days. -- Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message