From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 6 15:33:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053D110656D3; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 15:33:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676A88FC0A; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 15:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1QeU60-0005Wo-L5>; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 17:33:00 +0200 Received: from telesto.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.198]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1QeU60-0007nh-JE>; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 17:33:00 +0200 Message-ID: <4E14802C.70907@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 17:33:00 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" Organization: Freie =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Universit=E4t_Berlin?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110701 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: arrowdodger <6yearold@gmail.com> References: <4E1421D9.7080808@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E144913.3060503@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.198 Cc: FreeBSD Current , Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: Heavy I/O blocks FreeBSD box for several seconds X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:33:03 -0000 On 07/06/11 14:35, arrowdodger wrote: > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> Just curious what your current value of sysctl kern.sched.preempt_thresh >> is. >> And if it's not 224 and if you haven't tried 224 yet, then could you please >> try >> it and see if there is any improvement? >> >> This assumes that you use SCHED_ULE (kern.sched.name is "ULE"). >> >> -- >> Andriy Gapon >> > > Whoa, it's definitely better! Thanks a lot. But still, when IO causes system > to use swap, X11 became completely unusable. I had tkern.sched.preempt_thresh already set to 96.