From owner-freebsd-net  Sat Dec 16 11:38:27 2000
From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 16 11:38:25 2000
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from prism.flugsvamp.com (cb58709-a.mdsn1.wi.home.com [24.17.241.9])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C04137B400
	for <net@freebsd.org>; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 11:38:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from jlemon@localhost)
	by prism.flugsvamp.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBGJYdj75335;
	Sat, 16 Dec 2000 13:34:39 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from jlemon)
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 13:34:39 -0600 (CST)
From: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com>
Message-Id: <200012161934.eBGJYdj75335@prism.flugsvamp.com>
To: bmilekic@technokratis.com, net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Changing the names of some M_flags
X-Newsgroups: local.mail.freebsd-net
In-Reply-To: <local.mail.freebsd-net/Pine.BSF.4.21.0012161435130.34015-100000@jehovah.technokratis.com>
References: <local.mail.freebsd-net/20001216112130.Y19572@fw.wintelcom.net>
Organization: 
Cc: 
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

In article <local.mail.freebsd-net/Pine.BSF.4.21.0012161435130.34015-100000@jehovah.technokratis.com> you write:
>
>On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
>> I think M_DONTWAIT is fine as it was, and M_TRYWAIT instead of M_TRY_WAIT.
>> 
>> Leaving it as M_DONTWAIT should reduce the delta by quite a bit and
>> M_TRYWAIT vs M_TRY_WAIT because you have M_DONTWAIT/M_DONTBLOCK.
>> 
>> -Alfred
>
>	I agree. Anyone else before I re-roll? :-)

I second Alfred's suggestion.
--
Jonathan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message