From owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 13 14:01:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1F916A46F for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:01:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hsoftdev17@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE7743D5D for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:01:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hsoftdev17@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i24so1398595wra for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 07:01:14 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=t3RUSYkTC86LTmf/lx6ZTtAqRqhes7AbTtIoMyTyUAVCjcRNSCKF9RZVuTqGrzQCrEYo+oZQU8s6cJYmRgPaMbRKtXzj/v+NkeoL0BJ6pfEbz5jGTzoTENgB6sojv3oy19Zn1EfP0y+tAgjHjf/BK/nd7xPygLyUrj5JHTFCiy4= Received: by 10.54.140.8 with SMTP id n8mr2688748wrd; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 06:59:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.81.6 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 07:01:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6845d25a0606130701y77bdb7b4kb82162613b28d151@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 10:01:13 -0400 From: "Dave Stephens" To: "John Baldwin" In-Reply-To: <200606130911.10775.jhb@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060606195938.GA6581@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060612141235.3f7woozpc4888ksc@webmail.1command.com> <200606130911.10775.jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org, "Chris H." Subject: Re: Concluding the SMPng project X-BeenThere: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD SMP implementation group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:01:21 -0000 I have a low end "server" with a 3.2ghz single core P4 but HT is disabled by default and that seems like a waste to me. So my two cents would love to see actual useful gains from HT processors if requests are being made. :) On 6/13/06, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 12 June 2006 17:12, Chris H. wrote: > > Quoting Kris Kennaway : > > > > > Several of us have been discussing recently whether it is time to > > > bring the SMPng project to a formal conclusion. > > > > > > According to the SMPng project webpage, > > > > > > "The end goal of the SMPng Project is to decompose the Giant lock > > > into a number of smaller locks, resulting in reduced contention (and > > > improved SMP performance)." > > > > > > Thanks to the hard work of many developers over the past ~6 years, this > > > goal is now complete. > > > > > > While Giant has not been completely eliminated from the kernel and > > > several subsystems are still giant-locked (notably ipv6, tty, and CAM, > > > although work is in progress on all of these fronts), kernel profiling > > > traces show that for many real-world application loads the Giant lock > > > is simply no longer a factor in the performance of the SMP kernel. > > > > > > See e.g. > > > > > > http://www.bsdcan.org/2006/papers/FilesystemPerformance.pdf > > > > > > for one such measurement of the extent of Giant locking in FreeBSD > > > 6.x; other real-world application workloads are similar. > > > > > > Some of the benefits of formally concluding the SMPng project are: > > > > > > * The focus of SMP development work has largely changed from "break up > > > Giant everywhere" to "carefully measure the effects of the locking > > > decisions that were made, and optimize for greater performance and > > > scalability". This is a major milestone and should be announced to > > > the world, perhaps under the banner of a new "FreeBSD Scalability > > > Project". > > > > > > * For example, a number of us are looking very closely at the nascent > > > FreeBSD port to the Sun Ultrasparc T1, which provides 32 virtual CPUs > > > (4 threads on 8 CPU cores) on a single chip. Optimizing for the new > > > generation of SMP hardware is going to be a major effort over the > > > coming year. > > > > Ahh, so the contributions made by the PIII & PIV CPU's were merely to > > obtain access to the Sparc systems, and the PIII & PIV will be relegated > > to the ubiquitous I386 scrap heap, as the future and ultimate goal of > > FreeBSD is to be Sun Microsystems. Pitty, FreeBSD has always provided > > such wide scalability. So easy to implement on so many architectures. > > I wish I had known it's agenda years ago. As I would not have spent > > so many years and so many dollars building *BSD based infrastructures. > > Perhaps I've misunderstood this announcement. But if not; > > good riddance. > > Umm, no. However, with multi-core becoming more fashionable, x86 systems > are going to start having more and more CPUs as well, so FreeBSD needs to > work on scaling up to more than say 4 CPUs. > > -- > John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ > "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-smp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-smp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >