From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 17:15:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0714106564A; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 17:15:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (trang.nuxi.org [74.95.12.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10E88FC1D; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 17:15:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n05HFOEw051239; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:15:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n05HFOiN051238; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:15:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:15:24 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Ed Schouten Message-ID: <20090105171523.GC50568@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <200901040020.n040KIcc041121@svn.freebsd.org> <20090104120434.GF93900@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20090104121331.GC14235@hoeg.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090104121331.GC14235@hoeg.nl> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: Kostik Belousov , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r186731 - head/sys/dev/syscons/teken X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:15:53 -0000 On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 01:13:31PM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote: > * Kostik Belousov wrote: > > IMHO, it would be much easier to try and use the new code if the > > TEKEN_XXX defines would be implemented as both sysctl and kernel > > tunables. > > Yes. Eventually we should add tunables, but first I want to get it > working correctly. Unfortunately there is a big amount of complexity > when switching to xterm. Why xterm and not vt100? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)