From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jun 22 16:55:20 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA28823 for current-outgoing; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 16:55:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shrimp.dataplex.net (shrimp.dataplex.net [208.2.87.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA28818 for ; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 16:55:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [208.2.87.4] (cod.dataplex.net [208.2.87.4]) by shrimp.dataplex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA16687; Sun, 22 Jun 1997 18:54:44 -0500 (CDT) X-Sender: rkw@shrimp.dataplex.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <199706221702.KAA13719@austin.polstra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 22 Jun 1997 18:54:28 -0500 To: Julian Elischer From: Richard Wackerbarth Subject: Re: Hmmmm, this is new.. Cc: John Polstra , Bruce Evans , jkh@time.cdrom.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 1:04 PM -0500 6/22/97, Julian Elischer wrote: >On Sun, 22 Jun 1997, John Polstra wrote: > >> Ooops. I wrote: > >> Never mind. That's not going to help anything. All the libraries >> are built before any is installed. A different solution is going to >> be needed. > >include -L ${USR_OBJ}/lib/libc >etc > >OSF1 builds a separate copy of usr/include and usr/lib >within the obj tree specifically to use for this. This is the kind of approach that we need to take in order to allow a build to be done on a multi-user or production machine without destroying the underlying system.