From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Mar 15 8:10: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D270137BB63 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 08:10:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id IAA46623; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 08:10:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 08:10:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200003151610.IAA46623@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Neil Blakey-Milner Subject: Re: misc/17394: mailwrapper is installed regardless of NO_SENDMAIL definition Reply-To: Neil Blakey-Milner Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR misc/17394; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Neil Blakey-Milner To: godsey@shaw.fidalgo.net Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/17394: mailwrapper is installed regardless of NO_SENDMAIL definition Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 18:05:21 +0200 On Wed 2000-03-15 (07:36), godsey@shaw.fidalgo.net wrote: > >Description: > mailwrapper should not be installed if NO_SENDMAIL is defined. This isn't intuitive, since mailwrapper isn't part of sendmail. You could ask for NO_MAILWRAPPER, if you must, or simply use mailwrapper the way it is supposed to be used. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner nbm@rucus.ru.ac.za To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message