From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 5 11:03:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6BA41065672 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:03:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stacey@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from doppler.zen.co.uk (doppler.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A82F8FC29 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:03:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.23.3.140] (helo=smarthost01.mail.zen.net.uk) by doppler.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Nyjmy-0003Z0-Ks; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:44:16 +0000 Received: from [82.68.31.182] (helo=unknown) by smarthost01.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Nyjmc-0006mN-0U; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 10:43:54 +0000 Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:45:04 +0100 From: S Roberts To: Warren Block , Jeremy Chadwick , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100405114504.00006188@unknown> In-Reply-To: References: <20100403174812.59c40c99.matheus@eternamente.info> <20100403205856.GA20454@icarus.home.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4cvs1 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-Smarthost01-IP: [82.68.31.182] Cc: Subject: Re: install touching mbr X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:03:07 -0000 Hello, On Sat, 3 Apr 2010 15:44:50 -0600 (MDT) Warren Block wrote: > On Sat, 3 Apr 2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 05:48:12PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > >> I just installed a 8.0R amd64 from memstick. when asked, I said to > >> leave mbr untouched. when I rebooted, it was freebsd bootloader > >> that was on control. this options is not what I think it should, > >> or there is really a issue here ? > > > > I can confirm this behaviour. Someone may have broken something > > when tinkering around in that part of sysinstall (since the > > Standard vs. BootMgr options were moved around compared to previous > > releases). > > Not sure how to repeat the bug, but it's been there at least a few > months: > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0909262030060.13303 > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?58c737d70909262054k7c7b1402w4f9c902fdca2640c > Sooo.., which **IS** the correct option to leave the existing MBR untouched??? Regards, S Roberts > -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"