From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Sep 20 23:48:26 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [207.154.226.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6123437B422; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 23:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id F30392B269; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 01:48:19 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 23:48:19 -0700
From: Paul Saab <paul@mu.org>
To: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
Cc: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: diskless workstation
Message-ID: <20000920234819.A68513@elvis.mu.org>
References: <E13bfhE-00015w-00@sexta.cs.huji.ac.il> <200009210609.XAA01851@mass.osd.bsdi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <200009210609.XAA01851@mass.osd.bsdi.com>; from msmith@freebsd.org on Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 11:09:35PM -0700
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Mike Smith (msmith@freebsd.org) wrote:
> 
> I think this is correct, actually. Danny, can you confirm that you're 
> using one of the class A address spaces (eg. 10.*.*.*?)
> 
> Actually, IMO the code around this is entirely wrong; we should always 
> respect the mask supplied by the server, and only use the canonical mask 
> if we don't get one at all.

It does.. look futher down in the code.

paul


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message