From owner-freebsd-current Thu May 15 04:07:46 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA13271 for current-outgoing; Thu, 15 May 1997 04:07:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA13266 for ; Thu, 15 May 1997 04:07:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id EAA20492; Thu, 15 May 1997 04:06:31 -0700 (PDT) To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RELENG_2_2 In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 15 May 1997 09:10:07 +0200." <19970515091007.KD50309@uriah.heep.sax.de> Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 04:06:30 -0700 Message-ID: <20488.863694390@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > . Make sure Thomas tells us they do indeed the correct maillocking (if > not, we should not risk shipping CDE CDs without a red warning > label: ``CAUTION: YOU CAN LOSE ALL YOUR MAIL AND CATS BY USING THIS > PRODUCT!'' :). Already done, and we're in fact planning on doing some simulated load testing to see if its flock() code actually does the right thing - as you've already pointed out, dtmail needs a writable /var/mail for many other things, like the tooltalk rendevous files. If the flock() code doesn't work then I'm going to ship it with the appropriate warning labels. > . Urge Thomas to have the actual problem fixed (maybe by consultants) > instead of being hacked up. I understand his desire to not spend I've urged many times, more than that I cannot do since it's obviously not my money being spent. :) Jordan