From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 19:30:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4105B16A4CF for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:30:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ion.franksworld.org (vhost.domainatlantic.com [67.18.185.244]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C3643D45 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:30:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laszlof@vonostingroup.com) Received: (qmail 21092 invoked by uid 98); 25 Oct 2004 14:33:56 -0000 Received: from laszlof@vonostingroup.com by ion.franksworld.org by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamdscan: 0.75.1. Clear:RC:0(68.72.248.38):SA:0(?/?):. Processed in 3.104268 secs); 25 Oct 2004 14:33:56 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=? Received: from unknown (HELO vonostingroup.com) (frank@cpmsg.com@68.72.248.38) by vhost.domainatlantic.com with SMTP; 25 Oct 2004 14:33:53 -0000 Message-ID: <417D5469.9070807@vonostingroup.com> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:30:49 -0400 From: Frank Laszlo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <20041023224654.GB4363@xor.obsecurity.org> <417CF8A9.9090003@vonostingroup.com> <20041025192727.GA63250@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20041025192727.GA63250@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: will@freeBSD.org Subject: Re: [ports-i386@FreeBSD.org: rlwrap-0.18 failed on i386 4] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:30:54 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 08:59:21AM -0400, Frank Laszlo wrote: > > >>I did a sweet of INDEX to check for other ports depending on >>devel/readline, I didnt come up with anything other than my own >>'ftp/quftp' port. Is this a new port? Or maybe I just missed it. >> >> > >It's been there for 3 years, so no :) > >In general you have to do a grep -r instead of just checking INDEX, >because not everything depends on a given port by default - the >dependency might be hidden behind an option. In this case, it's only >a dependency on 4.x systems since 5.x includes a newer version of >libreadline that satisfies the dependency requirements. > > > >>which needs to be upped to libreadline.so.5, I have submited a PR to fix >>this and CC'd the original port submiter (ijliao) The maintainer appears >>to be ports@. Maybe I should assume maintainership for this port? Thanks >>for the heads up Kris. >> >> > >Thanks, we can always use more maintainers :) > >Kris > > Should I submit a PR w/ patch for the MAINTAINER change? or can you hack this in? Thanks Regards, Frank