From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 29 21:58:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43264709 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:58:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-x22a.google.com (mail-qe0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01FE62D6A for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f42.google.com with SMTP id w7so552470qeb.15 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:58:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=YcA6LtD3vN+9+Vc/1o1TiQL3AyvEm43Rg1PRAWmLvr0=; b=dPIbMQI1sm9RzvzJJngPDHJyek1CfCOFY2tdtvqq2uIM8VSE5tOKKiyeKQuk7JCP5+ Kw/wIv+bsO2NSz2yaoG8tOd1QCf5SiqluqIKpHKYXJFtdfso8Kn7A0M35ATH2K5oiwh+ jLy+3dlvL/+Ju743Y8qven+QVvraxG3eqoH8k9qvCVGaJ7lv1/CjIeT8q8/U2uCwK8aO jV+NhFUjQa5qYmb5zUYzrd8PFBMvBEzjxJcaFvxsyFBYdklqzJN9ug1aHP9sLrybyL3Y Nu0lL7T4nXMuOy+/X3gA5A/EeTFrXnHW45rRHtUHIP7ZeWPrxzHLXN5f/F8Z3Q6cPFGU isvg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.6.99 with SMTP id z3mr6666472qez.27.1377813530238; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:58:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.1.98 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:58:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1079189088.15197172.1377784177805.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> <877gf4cj7o.wl%berend@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:58:50 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NFS on ZFS pure SSD pool From: Freddie Cash To: Eric Browning Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD FS X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:58:51 -0000 On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Eric Browning < ericbrowning@skaggscatholiccenter.org> wrote: > sysctl vfs.zfs.arc_meta_used yeilds: > > vfs.zfs.arc_meta_used: 6916698888 > > There is 56GB of RAM dedicated to ARC > So that's using the full 12.5% (one eighth) of the ARC. Depending on how efficient your ARC is (high data hit rates, low data hit rates, low actual memory usage, etc), you may want to test increasing this to see if it helps with the NFS cache hit rates stuff.