From owner-cvs-ports  Sun Sep  7 17:06:28 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA19414
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Sun, 7 Sep 1997 17:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from jmb@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA19215;
          Sun, 7 Sep 1997 17:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb>
Message-Id: <199709080002.RAA19215@hub.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/netscape4 Makefile ports/www/netscape4/files         md5 ports/www/netscape4/pkg PLIST
To: adam@veda.is (Adam David)
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 1997 17:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: jfieber@indiana.edu, ache@nagual.pp.ru, chuckr@glue.umd.edu,
        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199709072328.XAA16194@ubiq.veda.is> from "Adam David" at Sep 7, 97 11:28:35 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Adam David wrote:
> 
> > If there are two distinct versions now--navigator and
> > communicator--maybe there should be two ports?  The split is a
> > notable and widely discussed change in product strategy for
> > Netscape.
> 
> Makes sense.

	yes, please one port for navigator and one for communicator.

>  
> > I, for one, would not be in the *least* bit bothered by
> > non-functional mailto (and presumably news) URLs in exchange for
> > a web browser that didn't suck up every last bit of RAM and swap
> > space... (and I thought version 3 was a pig!)
> > 
> > -john

	it is using 26MB on my box right now.......
jmb